![Fixxx](https://pic-cc.com/data/avatars/m/0/110.jpg?1710675581"){kind=avatar}
- Joined
- 31.10.19
- Messages
- 1,659
- Reaction score
- 5,502
- Points
- 113
GEOINT is the collection, analysis and interpretation of imagery, maps and geodata (GPS, metadata) to describe and assess physical features and events on Earth. It's a branch of OSINT that combines satellite imagery, maps and social-media geotags to precisely establish time and location. Any OSINT practitioner, even the laziest, cannot deny the importance of GEOINT (location research).
That’s where we start. We won’t dig into minutiae like blue tags on poles or which tree grows where; those can be explored endlessly. Since we are lazy OSINTers, let’s simplify work using neural networks and other auxiliary resources. First, use services that collect different map layers in one place: https://javier.jimenezshaw.com/mapas/mapas.html
There are even railroad maps - handy for comparing different map types on one screen. Sometimes that’s necessary. To make life easier, we can view the same area on two maps simultaneously. The map list is in dropdowns at the top, where you can switch types for comparison. This is especially useful when analyzing a known area and searching for details. You might say: "This is abstract. What about something concrete?" Task: we have a photo of a place without metadata. Remember: photo metadata gives coordinates and other info. What if we don’t have it? We only have an image - we’ll handle it. For example, take a photo from Google - some urban scene, for instance, this one:
Of course, you could run the photo through reverse image search and look through millions of images for approximate matches and location clues. That’s a lot of work and accuracy is uncertain. But we’re lazy - why make it harder? Use simple but effective tools: https://www.imggeo.com - with up to 98% accuracy it can identify the location as 6100 Miramonte, Irvine, CA 92618 with coordinates GPS 33°38'24.216"N 117°44'48.048"W
Good, but that’s not enough. You found an address - now what? The next logical step is to see what’s there, who lives there and what the situation is. One main resource for US address information is https://www.zillow.com; it provides a property’s sales history, rental availability and price estimates. For this address, we see it’s a residential building with amenities, rooftop parking, in a good neighborhood with average rent around $3.8k/month.
Similar resources with comparable data include https://www.redfin.com and https://www.realtor.com. If needed, you can contact realtors or authorized agents for more detail. You can also use rental platforms like Airbnb or services such as https://www.homefacts.com/address/C...y/Irvine/92618/6100-Miramonte/330684432.html# for more context. For owner-specific information, https://www.spokeo.com can help; it's partially free and charges for detailed reports.
What does this information give us? At minimum, that a person living at 6100 Miramonte, Irvine, CA 92618 is not living in a refrigerator box on the street - and with some boldness and ingenuity (within the law), we can verify whether they actually reside there. We can call realtors and ask questions. Thus, we localized the photo, identified the address and determined the general socio-economic profile of residents. There is no universal recipe for all cases. If Zillow works in the US, Europe or Asia require other, highly localized tools and approaches. Each region has its own constraints and resources; you must choose tools according to local specifics. Global real-estate and rental platforms are useful for broad coverage, nearby comparisons and sometimes resident lists. The general approach: geolocation, realtor analysis and comparison of secondary data. If analyzing a photo taken on a street or in a rural area, imggeo.com often provides a high-probability location. Note that these resources yield higher accuracy in urban settings with unique markers and landmarks. Accuracy improves with available metadata and identifiable people in images; in rural areas precision is lower.
Short conclusion: a photo without metadata is not a dead end. The road is conquered by walking.
Basics: GEOINT is often understood as determining an object’s location from photos or video. Anything related to an object’s geography falls under GEOINT - any document, any data: bank statements, utility bills, audio tracks. Broadly speaking, GEOINT is the foundation of OSINT research, because without geographic anchoring the subject of research is Schrödinger’s owl - even without a globe. And since >70% of information we perceive is visual, visual data makes up a comparable share of such investigations.
That’s where we start. We won’t dig into minutiae like blue tags on poles or which tree grows where; those can be explored endlessly. Since we are lazy OSINTers, let’s simplify work using neural networks and other auxiliary resources. First, use services that collect different map layers in one place: https://javier.jimenezshaw.com/mapas/mapas.html
*multiple map types in one place.
There are even railroad maps - handy for comparing different map types on one screen. Sometimes that’s necessary. To make life easier, we can view the same area on two maps simultaneously. The map list is in dropdowns at the top, where you can switch types for comparison. This is especially useful when analyzing a known area and searching for details. You might say: "This is abstract. What about something concrete?" Task: we have a photo of a place without metadata. Remember: photo metadata gives coordinates and other info. What if we don’t have it? We only have an image - we’ll handle it. For example, take a photo from Google - some urban scene, for instance, this one:
*this is just an example.
Of course, you could run the photo through reverse image search and look through millions of images for approximate matches and location clues. That’s a lot of work and accuracy is uncertain. But we’re lazy - why make it harder? Use simple but effective tools: https://www.imggeo.com - with up to 98% accuracy it can identify the location as 6100 Miramonte, Irvine, CA 92618 with coordinates GPS 33°38'24.216"N 117°44'48.048"W
*click the Analyze Image button.
Good, but that’s not enough. You found an address - now what? The next logical step is to see what’s there, who lives there and what the situation is. One main resource for US address information is https://www.zillow.com; it provides a property’s sales history, rental availability and price estimates. For this address, we see it’s a residential building with amenities, rooftop parking, in a good neighborhood with average rent around $3.8k/month.
Similar resources with comparable data include https://www.redfin.com and https://www.realtor.com. If needed, you can contact realtors or authorized agents for more detail. You can also use rental platforms like Airbnb or services such as https://www.homefacts.com/address/C...y/Irvine/92618/6100-Miramonte/330684432.html# for more context. For owner-specific information, https://www.spokeo.com can help; it's partially free and charges for detailed reports.
*Spokeo.
What does this information give us? At minimum, that a person living at 6100 Miramonte, Irvine, CA 92618 is not living in a refrigerator box on the street - and with some boldness and ingenuity (within the law), we can verify whether they actually reside there. We can call realtors and ask questions. Thus, we localized the photo, identified the address and determined the general socio-economic profile of residents. There is no universal recipe for all cases. If Zillow works in the US, Europe or Asia require other, highly localized tools and approaches. Each region has its own constraints and resources; you must choose tools according to local specifics. Global real-estate and rental platforms are useful for broad coverage, nearby comparisons and sometimes resident lists. The general approach: geolocation, realtor analysis and comparison of secondary data. If analyzing a photo taken on a street or in a rural area, imggeo.com often provides a high-probability location. Note that these resources yield higher accuracy in urban settings with unique markers and landmarks. Accuracy improves with available metadata and identifiable people in images; in rural areas precision is lower.
Short conclusion: a photo without metadata is not a dead end. The road is conquered by walking.
